Insurance

Builders Fight for Value Recognition for Energy-Efficient Homes

Last week, HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan and U.S. Department of Energy Secretary Steven Chu met at an energy auditing company on Long Island to announce the launch of the FHA’s new PowerSaver pilot program.

Working with 18 lenders across the country, the program will allow homeowners to borrow up to $25,000 to finance energy improvements in an existing home, including improvements to insulation, duct sealing, replacement doors and windows, HVAC systems, water heaters, solar panels, and geothermal systems. Terms can go up to 20 years, and rates will be lower than standard. The FHA will guarantee up to 90% of the loan.

The idea is to generate interest in the private sector, which Donovan is hoping will get on board by providing these types of loans more readily.

Fannie Mae recently came out with a similar offering, a new Energy Improvement feature for mortgage loans. Fannie had already stopped offering its Energy Efficient Mortgage feature, which could have been used to finance the purchase of a new energy-efficient home. The replacement program can only be used to make energy improvements to an existing home.

The financing will cover energy improvements deemed cost-effective by a RESNET home energy rating, and amounts can go up to 10% of the post-improvement appraisal.

Unlike Fannie, the FHA still has a program for buyers of energy-efficient new homes intact. Its Energy Efficient Mortgage program can be used to help home buyers finance energy-efficient features in a new home as part of an FHA insured mortgage.

However, the increasing shift in emphasis toward improving the energy efficiency of existing homes rather than new homes is symptomatic of the disconnect between what government entities see as the market reality and what builders are seeing in the field.

According to a Fannie Mae spokesperson, the company feels that private lenders are meeting the needs of buyers of energy-efficient homes, suggesting that lenders will value energy-efficient features appropriately.

Shaun Donovan agrees. When Builder questioned Donovan after the PowerSaver announcement about why the government seemed to be moving its focus to existing homes, Donovan emphasized that the benefits of energy-efficient building are being recognized by private sector lenders and appraisers.

“We’ve seen greater progress in the new-home market through local building codes,” Donovan told Builder. “What we’ve seen more and more are appraisers and Realtors who see the value in [energy-efficient construction], and lenders are recognizing that.”

But that’s not what builders are saying.

About two years ago, Meritage Homes decided to go all-in with energy efficiency. “We took the approach that we were going to start over and change the way we build,” C.R. Herro, vice president of environmental affairs at Meritage, told Builder. “We frame different. We build different. We use different appliances and features.”

As a result, Herro reports that Meritage can build a home that uses half the energy and half the water of a traditional home with only a 10% increase in the cost of construction. The energy-saving upgrades Meritage includes can save the homeowner between $1,200 and $3,600 a year in utility bills, depending on the home (some of Meritage’s homes achieve net-zero energy efficiency).  

But when asked if appraisers and banks recognize the value of the energy-efficiency benefits Meritage includes, Herro replied emphatically, “Absolutely not! We’re building a lot of significant improvements into our homes. We’re doing net zero. We’re doing solar. And we’re struggling to get a penny out of it.”

“Conventional construction is leaky,” Herro said. “A traditional home will have to recondition all of the air in the entire house 70 times a day. When you rebuild [to high energy-efficiency standards], you can cut that down to five.” According to Herro, such a reduction would cut heating and air-conditioning costs down by 60%.

The trouble, Herro said, is that the people consumers look to when trying to gauge the value of a home—appraisers and lenders—are failing to recognize the value in the energy-efficiency upgrades the homes include, and as a result, the builder is forced to absorb that additional cost.

Despite these challenges, Meritage has been able to make energy-efficient building work as a business model, largely because of customer awareness that sees the value in it. Also, as one of the largest builders in the country, Meritage is able to achieve economies of scale by building all of its homes to energy-efficient standards. “But the average builder is incentivized to build a less energy-efficient home,” Herro said. “It’s ridiculous that you can build to [a high] level of efficiency, but it has a negative effect on your income statement.”

In an effort to remedy the problem, Herro is promoting the Sensible Accounting to Value Energy (SAVE) Act, a proposal supported by Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) that would require federal loan agencies to take into account the expected energy costs of a home when assessing a mortgage loan application.

“Homeowners who spend less on energy will have more money to make mortgage payments and to maintain and repair their homes,” SAVE Act press materials say. “A person will be less likely to have to choose between paying the utility company or his or her lender.”

The materials also point out that the average U.S. household will spend more than $2,300 in energy costs over the course of a year, “more than the average cost of property taxes or homeowners insurance, two expenses that are routinely underwritten in a mortgage loan. Energy costs are not accounted for in this process.”

“If you take all the things out of a home that waste resources and money, that innovation costs a little bit more,” Herro said. “The problem is that building better, until the average consumer recognizes the benefits, is disincentivized by the establishment.”

This article was written by Claire  Easley

To visit the full article, click on the link: http://www.ecohomemagazine.com/news/2011/04-april/builders-fight-for-value-recognition-for-energy-efficient-homes.aspx

CFL Bulbs, Why and How to Recycle

In my profession, one of the most common questions that I get is do CFL bulbs really make that much of a difference and why should I switch? This can be looked at in many different ways but here are some points that I feel are key.

• Saves 40.00 in electricity costs over its lifetime
• Uses 75% less energy than incandescent bulbs and lasts ten times longer
• Produces 75% less heat

The important thing is to recognize where to install them to get these benefits. It’s recommended to install them in heavy traffic areas such as the kitchen, living room and recreational rooms. Also, to make them the most effective they should be left on for a minimum of 10 minutes as frequent turning off and on will shorten their life span. Typically a CFL bulb costs 5.00 and lasts 10,000 hours whereas, the cost of a regular incandescent bulb is in the area of 0.75 and lasts 1,000 hours. Over time, you will save some money on buying the bulbs but also the energy savings as well. If you aren’t convinced yet, then maybe our friends at Energy Star can help because this is staggering, “If every American home replaced just one light with a light that’s earned the ENERGY STAR, we would save enough energy to light 3 million homes for a year, save about $600 million in annual energy costs, and prevent 9 billion pounds of greenhouse gas emissions per year, equivalent to those from about 800,000 cars.”

Finally, one of the most important things to remember is how to recycle them because they do contain a little bit of mercury. First and foremost, don’t put them in your regular trash can instead take them to Home Depot of you can use this friendly website to locate a place near you. www.earth911.org  Another fantastic site that can help with safe containers for recycling in the home, office or commercial sites is personal friends of mine at www.buschsystems.com

The Importance of Insulation

What is insulation?

 Insulation is defined as a material or combination of materials which impede the flow of heat. The materials can be adapted to any size, shape or surface. The term ‘insulation’ refers to materials which provide substantial resistance to heat flow. When these materials are installed in the ceiling, walls, and floors of a building, heat flow into and out of the building is reduced, and the need for heating and cooling is minimized.

 Insulation is the most effective way to improve the energy efficiency of a home and building. Insulation of the building envelope helps keep heat in during the winter, but let’s heat out during summer to improve comfort and save energy. Insulating a home can save 45–55% of heating and cooling energy.

 Benefits of Insulation 

• Comfort is improved year around
• There is less need for heating and cooling
• Can help reduce noise

Scams with insulation

As a homeowner the only way you can truly have your insulation tested for effectiveness is having an audit performed or by having someone climb into your attic to visually access your insulation. First, you must identify the failures before determining what to install and second, it might be best just to fix the failures.  Plus adding more insulation on top of the current insulation which is not performing will only help you little. Another recommendation would be to ask the company to take pictures of their findings so you can see where improvements can be made.  Be careful as a lot of companies will sell you more than you need.  Most homes have plenty of insulation, but it’s poorly installed or has been knocked out of place. Reattaching it to the floors, ceilings and walls it’s meant to protect could save you a bundle of money – both on replacement product and on energy bills.

Tips to Avoid Energy-Efficiency Scams

We’re all trying to save money on energy bills these days. Plenty of people who sell energy-saving products are willing to take unfair advantage of you in your quest to save a buck. You won’t save any money or energy if you buy products from people who make false claims. When it comes to purchasing air-conditioners, insulation, roofing and even AC services, we homeowners have to do our homework before we start writing checks. Don’t let a salesperson mislead you into spending too much or buying an ineffective product because you don’t have the facts.

 Here are a few ways homeowners get scammed when it comes to energy efficiency because of actions by sales reps.

 1. They sell you more than you need. As we gear up for another scorching Arizona summer, there are a lot of ads for companies that want to over-insulate your attic to a level of R-60, which won’t save you any more money on air-conditioning bills than the recommended R-38. In fact, there’s a good chance you don’t even need new insulation at all. Most homes have plenty of insulation, but it’s poorly installed or has been knocked out of place. Reattaching it to the floors, ceilings and walls it’s meant to protect could save you a bundle of money – both on replacement product and on energy bills.

 2. They convince you that high-tech is better than common sense. The least-expensive way to slash your energy bills is to reach for the “low-hanging fruit” in your house – small, low-cost improvements. Instead of getting hooked into buying an expensive package of multiple new systems, start your energy campaign by sealing your air-conditioner’s ducts, caulking windows and doors and checking weather stripping. Have an energy audit to determine if your attic is properly and passively ventilated and that your insulation is well-installed. That will help you more than investing thousands of dollars in optional equipment.

 3. They can’t prove the claims. It’s illegal to say a product will slash energy bills, insulate your attic or reduce heat gain without tests to back up the claim. Ask for the research….if the product has passed these tests, you can be sure the manufacturer will have that information all over its website. Bottom line, if you can’t find it? Don’t buy it.

 4. They insist bigger is better. This is a common claim when it comes to buying an air-conditioner. It used to be that bigger homes needed larger AC units. Newer homes are so tight, however, that they need far less powerful systems than older homes with lots of air leaks. Find an AC rep that will get a lot of information about your house, the weather and your family’s lifestyle – and use a computer to calculate the size of your new air-conditioner. If that’s not happening, find a different contractor.

Very Important Update Regarding FHA Financing

Here is the latest information on FHA Mortgage Insurance increases:

FHA publishes MIP changes ( http://bit.ly/acon4I )

Main points:

• • Effective for case numbers assigned on or after October 4^th, the new MIP structure will be implemented.
  • Upfront premium will be 1% for all forward mortgages (purchases and refinances including streamlines)
  • Annual premium
    • Over 15 year terms
      • 90 bps for LTVs over 95%
      • 85 bps for LTVs of 95% or less
    • 15 year term or less
      • 25 bps for above 90% LTV
      • No annual premium for 90% LTV or less

So what does this mean for you and your clients?

On a $200k loan amount at today’s annual FHA MI rate is $91.67 per month in mortgage insurance (MI).

On a $200k loan amount at the new annual rate is $150.00 per month, an increase of $58.33 per month.

On the surface, a reduction in the upfront MI sounds like a nice trade off for the increased annual mortgage insurance right?  Well…let’s take a look at that.  On a $200k loan amount that reduces the upfront MI by $2,000 that was rolled into the loan so it reduces the P&I payment by about $6.00 per month.  Sounds good so far right?

But with the increased annual MI the overall PITI payment goes up by more than $52.00 per month.  Over the next 10 years, before that MI drops off on it’s own, the buyer will pay over $6,000 in additional annual mortgage insurance premiums.

Since mortgage insurance is a pure finance charge that directly increases the APR, it essentially and very directly increases the cost of financing to your buyers.  Not to mention the increase in the debt to income ratio which could have some clients looking for a less expensive house or simply not qualifying to buy.

This basically makes the cost of FHA financing for the buyer more than $4,000 higher in the first ten years.  And if that isn’t a new tax, I don’t know what is.

This change is set to take place for FHA case numbers assigned on or after October 4th, 2010.  October 4th is a Monday.  Make sure your case number is assigned by Friday October 1st, 2010 to avoid the increase.

Please feel free to call me with any questions.  If you find this information to be a great reason to contact your database, I always appreciate your referrals.

Spencer Anglin.com | NMLS# 226533
Velocity Financial, LLC | Office Map | Phoenix Homeowner’s PIT Stop Blog
O: 480.287.5719 | C: 602.705.6293 | F: 1.866.589.5742
Click here for the HUD Cost Settlement Booklet

Watch The Video – Milton Friedman:  Liberty and Equality?

Home Owners Associations

Homeowner’s Associations are a huge issue with short sales and REO properties. Many times escrow is presented with a contract, negotiations are complete on the short sale or the REO, escrow proceeds and closes – a few weeks/months later escrow is contacted by the new owner who has received a bill for delinquent dues and transfer fees. Owner wants to know who will pay. Sellers in both types of transactions have no money with which to pay these ‘after the fact’ bills. Short Sale sellers know if there is an HOA, so they need to be questioned about this subject. REO sellers, however, may or may not know if there is an association, so this is where the Realtor’s experience comes in. You may know the neighborhood, so, please, if you do know there is an HOA, mention it to escrow so the information can be followed up on.

Canadian Citizens

Canadian citizens document signings:  To sign in the United States, they will need a passport AND a visa as identification.  Should the party wish to sign in Canada, they have two choices:  They can go to the U.S. Consulate OR be signed by an attorney.  The signed documents must be accompanied by a Canadian Certification of Notary.  Sellers will also need to complete the FIRPTA (Foreign Investment Real Property Tax Act) forms.  Depending on the use of the property, there may be a charge at close of escrow of 10% of the sales price which is remitted to IRS per the FIRPTA laws.

The transfer of funds from a Canadian Bank must be in US Dollars and there may be charges for that conversion of funds from Canadian to US dollars.

Lisa Capes

Chicago Title Insurance

capesl@ctt.com

www.chicagotitlearizona.com/capes

In Order to Give Good Funds We Have to Receive Good Funds

When purchasing a home there are two checks written during the process.  First, a check written for Earnest Money. Earnest Money is given as a promise to the seller that the buyer is serious about purchasing thier home.  Earnest Money is usually given in the form of personal check made payable to the title company closing the escrow.  The second check is given at the signing table during the close of escrow.  

The Earnest Money check paid by personal check to the Title Company is usually an adequate form of payment due to the fact once escrow is opened there is time for the check to clear prior to the close of escrow.  However, the check given for final closing cost at the close of escrow MUST be in the form of a Certified Check.  You must request this type of check from the teller at the bank.  If the teller hands you a check with “Official Bank Check” written at the top, this is not the same as a Certified Check and could be denied at the signing table.  This would result in a potential delay of the closing of the transaction. 

Other forms of “Good Funds” accepted by Chicago Title Insurance are monies that are wired from bank to bank.  Those funds are good immeadeatly.

For more information please contact

Lisa Capes, Sales Representative

Chicago Title Insurance (Arizona)

capesl@ctt.com